A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around October 21, 2013, the Defendant was driving Cpoter cargo in a state of under the influence of alcohol of about 1k and about 0.123% of alcohol content on the part of the 1k section from the front of the stamp distance, which is located in the front of the new road at the same time, in a safe-fluence-dong, to the front of the new road at the same time.

2. On June 14, 2014, the Defendant: (a) violated the Road Traffic Act (Driving without a license) and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) and the Defendant driven C Poter cargo while under the influence of alcohol at about 0.270% without obtaining a driver’s license in a section of about 500 meters from the front side of the Central University, which was coming from the Do in front of the city in the direction of the city in which the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol at around 3:30, to the front side of the restaurant.

3. On June 14, 2014, the Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, as the owner of C Poter Cargo, operated the said truck at a section of about 500 meters from the front of the Central University, which was at the same time in the direction of the C Poter, in front of the Central University, which was at the direction of the C Poter, to the front road of the restaurant, without purchasing liability insurance.

4. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of CPoter cargo vehicles.

On June 14, 2014, at around 23:30 on June 23:30, the Defendant driven the above cargo and got to turn to the left the front of the restaurant, which is located on the alley of the ductal of the duct.

At the time, there was a duty of care to safely turn to the left by checking the right and the right and the right of the driver.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and received the back part of the E-learning passenger car, which is owned by the victim D, and G bargaining passenger car, which is owned by the victim F, and the back part of the G bargaining passenger car, which is owned by the victim F, from the negligence of left the left, and later later, they were driven by the defendant.