The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. The Defendant, at around 23:00 on December 17, 2015, engaged in a dispute with the victim G (F) professor of the same university (F) who made the seminars at Eiart G (F) in the Eiart Do, Seopo-si, Seopo-si, Seopo-si on the instant facts charged, and caused an injury to the victim by cutting down the victim’s breabbbbbage beyond the bottom by breaking the booming the breath, thereby causing approximately three weeks of medical treatment.

Accordingly, the defendant injured the victim.

2. Determination

A. G does not have any statement from the investigative agency to this court that “the Defendant was shaking his bridged” with respect to G’s statement.

In addition, considering the following circumstances, G and H relations, which can be known through one recording, it is difficult to believe G’s statements as they are.

1) Regarding the background that the Defendant laid G beyond the floor, G made a statement to the investigative agency, hospital, and this court: (a) “the Defendant saw G with a bad hand and pushed off G; and (b) “the Defendant saw G with a salbbbbbbbing and salbing G; and (c)”; (b) “the Defendant saw G’s salbbing and pushed off G with a salbage; and (d) “the Defendant salbing and pushed off G with a strong balbbling, thereby getting off G” and consistent.

In addition, G reversed one's own statements in this Court several times.

2) G은 경찰에서 최초로 진술할 때 ‘ 피고인이 자신을 발로 찼다’, ‘ 피고인이 자신의 목을 졸랐다’, ‘ 피고인이 자신의 멱살을 잡자 자신도 피고인의 멱살을 잡았다’, ‘ 피고인과 H도 함께 넘어졌다’ 는 등의 언급을 하지 않았다( 수사기록 10쪽 ~13 쪽 참조). 그런 데 G은 경찰 제 2회 참고인조사 이후로 위와 같은 진술을 점점 추가하고 있다( 수사기록 29 쪽, 40 쪽 참조). 이처럼 G의 진술은 피해 경위에 관하여 시간이 지날 수록 내용이 구체화되고 추가 되고 있는데, 이는 경험칙에 부합하지 않는다.

3) G’s statement is “G and Defendant.”