The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant did not inflict an injury on the victim, such as the time of the original adjudication, but the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty is erroneous in misunderstanding of facts.

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, ① the victim has consistently stated in the investigative agency and the court below that “the defendant was unsatisfying after being pushed down,” ② the victim stated that “the defendant and the victim did not suffer a dispute with the victim,” which was investigated by the investigative agency on the date of the occurrence of the instant case,” ③ especially G made the statement opposite to the defendant’s position while the defendant was investigated into the earth, ④ the police officer dispatched to the scene at the time used the wheel, and the defendant was able to write down the wheel in hand, and the defendant did not appear to have been able to satisfy or smuggling the victim’s satch on the day when the defendant used the wheel, and the defendant did not reverse the court below’s statement that it was difficult to satisfy the victim’s satch on the day of the instant case, in light of the fact that the defendant did not satisfy and did not have any other statements made by the investigative agency.”