1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Basic facts

A. On October 24, 2012, the Defendant filed a complaint with the Plaintiff on October 24, 2012, with the purport that the Plaintiff was subject to joint assault from the imprisonment C on October 9, 2012.

B. On September 13, 2013, the Defendant testified to the effect that he was present as a witness in the Daegu District Court 2013 High Court 2013 High Court 1506 case and was assaulted by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant testimony”).

C. On November 6, 2013, the Plaintiff was found not guilty of the facts constituting the crime stated in the foregoing paragraph in the Daegu District Court Decision 2013Gohap1506 and July 18, 2014, the appellate court of Daegu District Court 2013No3628, which was the appellate court.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 2 and 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff asserts that since the plaintiff suffered mental pain due to the defendant's non-accompetence and perjury, the defendant is obligated to pay consolation money of KRW 20,000,000 and delay damages to the plaintiff.

The defendant reported false facts against his memory solely on the ground that the plaintiff was found not guilty of the above facts of crime.

It is not sufficient to recognize that a person made a false statement, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Rather, according to the statements in the evidence Nos. 1 and 4, the defendant was indicted for perjury due to the testimony of this case, but the court of first instance and the appellate court find the defendant not guilty on the ground that the defendant could have made the testimony of this case in accordance with his memory. Thus, even if considering this, the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.