The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant charged the instant charges is a person engaging in driving a passenger vehicle B.

On October 11, 2019, the Defendant driven the above car at the rate of 08:45 on the two weeks, and proceeded at approximately 57.17 km in the speed of 3 lanes in front of the rooftop 475-dong at the two weeks, along the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the sublime, from the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the parallel of the two cities at the speed of about 57.17 km.

At the time, there was a good weather time, and there was a pedestrian crossing installed in an apartment zone, and the flow of vehicles is frequent, so in such a case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to prevent the accident in advance by accurately manipulating the steering direction, brakes, and other devices of the vehicle, as well as the traffic situation of the front line is well examined.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and did not discover the victim E (the age 15) who was crossing the D Busp from the c apartment room to the area of the D bus stop in the front bank due to the negligence of the defendant's neglecting it, and did not discover the victim E (the age 15) and got the victim to go beyond the ground.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from serious injury to the victim due to the foregoing occupational negligence.

2. Determination

(a) Crimes of non-compliance with intent: The main sentence of Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents;

(b) The victim shall express his/her intention not to punish him/her after prosecution;

(c) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;