Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

In 2012, the Defendant, instead of removing miscellaneous miscellaneous miscellaneouss into the Defendant’s dry field, had the Defendant leased the said dry field without compensation to cultivate a miscellaneous miscellaneous miscellaneous miscellaneous miscellaneous miscellaneous miscellaneouss, and the Defendant did not comply with the Defendant’s request to remove miscellaneous miscellaneous miscellaneous miscellaneous miscellaneouss in the dry field because the miscellaneous miscellaneous miscellaneous miscellaneous miscellaneous miscellaneous miscellaneous miscellaneous miscellaneouss were not timely sold to the dry field, and the Defendant did not comply with the Defendant’s request to remove miscellaneous miscellaneouss promptly.

피고인은 2013. 6. 4. 07:50경 전남 고흥군 D마을에 있는 피해자 경작의 양파 밭에서 위와 같은 불만에 화가 나 피해자가 출하를 하기 위해 밭 곳곳에 수확하여 쌓아둔 양파더미 부근에 농약 튐 방지를 위한 삿갓을 장착하지 않은 채 등짐형 수동식 압축분무기로 제초제인 일명 ‘삭술이’를 살포하여 피해자로 하여금 양파의 식품안전성을 우려한 나머지 피해자 소유인 시가 1,732,500원 상당의 상품 출하용 양파 105망(1망 20kg)의 출하를 포기하게 함으로써 그 효용을 해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Each police statement of C;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on internal investigation;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 366 of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The gist of the assertion is that the Defendant did not contact the two spawn cultivated by C while breaking the first system, and thus, the Defendant does not constitute an offense against the Defendant.

2. 판단 증인 C은 이 법정에서, "제초제를 분무기를 이용하여 뿌리는 경우, 삿갓을 씌우지 않으면 제초제가 바람의 영향을 받아 의도하지 않은 곳으로 날리게 된다.

그런데 사건 당일 피고인이 삿갓을 씌우지 않은 제초제 분무기를 이용하여 제초제를 살포하였고, 그날은...