logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.11.18 2020나43601
약정금 반환 청구의 소
Text

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following portions, and thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of

2. On the second page of the judgment of the court of first instance, the portion of the application shall be the “insurance solicitor” of No. 14 below.

According to the 2nd judgment of the first instance court, the 7th " argument of the parties" in the 7th judgment shall be considered as the "party's argument".

According to the second judgment of the court of first instance, the actual contents of the case are as follows: "The defendant is a new settlement support fee to the defendant" in Part 4 as "the defendant is a new settlement support fee."

According to the third judgment of the first instance court, the "fact" in the third sentence shall be considered as "fact".

In light of the fact that the 4th page of the judgment of the first instance court, “The above documents are not written, and the contents of the documents are not written, and the above disbursement resolution seems to have been prepared in preparation for tax investigation, not by each disbursement date,” the above documents shall be deemed to be “the above documents.”

3. The judgment of the first instance is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

arrow