1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. On June 12, 2009, the Defendant is the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Housing Redevelopment Development and Improvement Project Association (hereinafter “the head of Eunpyeong-gu”) that obtained authorization for establishment from the head of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “the head of Eunpyeong-gu”) for the purpose of implementing the Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Project (hereinafter “instant Project”), and the Plaintiffs own real estate located in the instant project area.

B. On May 18, 2011, the head of Eunpyeong-gu approved the Defendant’s project implementation plan (project cost: KRW 303,802,369,679; hereinafter “the initial project implementation plan of this case”) and announced it on May 26, 201 (Public Notice AC of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government), and its main contents are as follows:

2. Location and area of an improvement zone: The Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Group AB (66,094 square meters);

4. Period for implementing the rearrangement project: 60 months from the date of authorization for project implementation;

7. Multi-family housing units with a site for the main purpose of a building with a height of 53,609.00 25.04 240.96 58 meters (ground 4 stories 20 stories) among the matters concerning a building plan;

8. The number of units of housing units classified as housing units, such as the size of housing units (based on the exclusive use area) 139.08 PA 114.08 9 PA 114.9 9 PA 114.9 9 PC 114.9 9 PC 114.9 8PD 92 47 89 TPP 84.9 PE 84 9 PE 84.9 PE 84 99 PE 84. 99 PE 84. 97 PE 84. 97 PE 84. 97 84. 98 PE 684. 96 198 PE 964 1986, 1941 208 PE 1984, 2014 TPP 284 19837, 2014 28. 19

C. The Defendant received the application for parcelling-out from July 22, 2011 to September 19, 2011, and there was no member who applied for parcelling-out with respect to a large square of 139 square meters, and there was no member who applied for parcelling-out with respect to a square of 114 square meters. The number of members who applied for parcelling-out with respect to a square of 114 square meters is limited to

On the other hand, the plaintiffs filed an application for parcelling-out within the above period.

The defendant shall hold a general meeting on July 25, 2013 to execute the project in this case.