A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[2012 Highest 6237]

1. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle of d Pesta F430 on the grounds that the defendant is a person who violates the Road Traffic Act (licensed driving) and the Road Traffic Act (not after the accident).

On November 26, 2012, at around 23:00, the Defendant driven the said vehicle without obtaining a driver's license, and driven the said vehicle by a method of coming from the YC bank to the side of the string of the string of the string of the 1034-12, a large string of the string of the land at hand.

At the same time, the road is narrow along the backway and the opposite direction, and the FNF Duna taxi driven by the victim E (the age of 40) was driven in order to walk with the above vehicle, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the front side and the left side and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right of the driver.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was found to have moved the above vehicle due to the negligence that caused the above vehicle to turn off, and caused the above vehicle to turn back to the right edge of the above NF Sota si, which stopped at the right edge of the above NF Sota si, and received the front part of the above NF Sora si's driver's seat in front of the above Pesta si.

Ultimately, the Defendant did not take necessary measures by negligence on the part of the Defendant, even though he damaged the said NF Banon-si to the extent equivalent to KRW 300,086,00 for repairing the said NF si.

2. On November 30, 2012, the Defendant, even though committing the crime as referred to in paragraph 1, ordered him to be aware of the unauthorized driving of the Defendant, and, on November 30, 2012, the Defendant stated that “G, by telephone, had the Defendant friendly with the Defendant, attempted to have the Defendant make a statement as he appeared at the police station and had him make a statement as he would have been able to be able to do so.”