logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.01.16 2013가단2888
채무부존재확인
Text

1. The Defendant driving at around 14:40 on October 13, 2012 B ready-mixed vehicles, thereby running the Seongdong-gu Seoul Aro-dong Round apartment.

Reasons

Basic Facts

On December 28, 2011, the Plaintiff, an insurance company, concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract (hereinafter “instant contract”) with the Defendant for business use, such as the attached list, with the insured as the Defendant, with respect to B ready-mixed vehicles (hereinafter “instant vehicle”).

[10] Personal and physical accidents

1. (1) The Plaintiff is bound to compensate for any loss incurred when the insured died or was injured due to an accident of the insured motor vehicle occurring during the possession, use, and management of the insured motor vehicle.

(2) The limits of insurance proceeds that the Plaintiff pays for a self-physical accident are as follows.

(2) Injury: When the insured requires medical treatment as a direct result of the injury, / [26] Criteria for Payment of Self-Physical Accidents / 1) Classification of Injury and Limit to the amount of insurance coverage on the table of the amount of insurance coverage for each grade. / [26] Criteria for Payment of Self-Physical Accidents / [1] Classification of Injury and the amount of insurance coverage for each grade shall be based on the classification of injury as provided for in Table 1 attached to the Enforcement Decree of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act. The main contents of the terms and conditions applicable to the contract of this case

On October 13, 2012, the Defendant driving the instant vehicle around 14:40 during the insurance period of the instant contract, and driving the instant vehicle along the second line of the 2nd line of the Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Round-dong Gaowon Apartment Apartment apartment, resulting in an accident (hereinafter “the instant accident”).

At the time of the instant accident, the situation is the same as the attached drawing (part of A 3-2). The instant accident was committed by the Defendant, driving the instant vehicle, proceeding the three distance in the rooftop area to the Hannam-dong direction from the direction of the bridge, and due to the unforeseen cause, the Defendant was faced with even the rear, even and the front of the damaged vehicle due to the spread on the left side of the instant vehicle.

The defendant is not aware immediately after the accident of this case.

arrow