Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On May 31, 2013, around 01:50, the victim said that the defendant and the foreigner want to run in front of the D main points located in the Suwon-si Metropolitan Area C, the victim said that the defendant and the foreigner want to run in the front of the D main points.

Accordingly, the Defendant entered the above main station, and putting the beer bottled in the table, and putting the victim in the vicinity of the entrance, and putting the beer disease up to the victim by sounding the “weak” at the door, but putting the victim at the beer's face. However, the Defendant did not see the victim, and caused the victim's face to the upper door of the entrance, and caused the victim's face.

As a result, the defendant put the victim into a 14-day medical examination, a divesalopic divestrophy, and a heat.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. A protocol of examination of part of the defendant by prosecution;

1. E prosecutorial statement;

1. A protocol of partial police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A written statement;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. On-site photographs and photographs of the damaged part;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (report on the F phone recording statement by a reference witness);

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the record of this case regarding the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel under the main text of Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act and Article 191(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant’s judgment is based on the following: (a) the victim was at the entrance at the time of the Defendant’s having been a beer disease; (b) there was a dispute with the victim immediately before the Defendant was a beer disease; and (c) the foreigners who first occurred with the Defendant were located outside of the entrance as indicated in the judgment set out below; and (d) under such circumstances, the Defendant voiceed “the Defendant must” and got a beer disease toward the entrance.