1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 21,825,264 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and its related amount from July 13, 2012 to March 27, 2014.

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Basic facts

A. The relationship 1) The Plaintiff is a company that processes and sells lumbers, etc., and the Defendant is a company that manufactures and sells protective tapes necessary for wood processing. 2) The Plaintiff goes through the process of “catning” attaching protective tapes to furnitures to be supplied to furniture companies in order to prevent scraping, which may occur in the course of cutting and using them by household companies supplied by the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff has traded for about 15 years with the Defendant that supplies protective tapes used therein.

B. Defect occurrence and defect processing work 1) The Plaintiff is Lbrate Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Lbrate”).

(A) An E&P Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “E&W”) that received a contract for household production from the Plaintiff.

) From January 18, 2012 to January 31, 2012, 2012, Jeju SP Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “AS”) that received a contract for household production from Lbrate as well as the contract for household production.

From January 30, 2012 to February 24, 2012, the processed timber supplied by the Defendant was supplied to the Defendant. 2) However, even though the removal of the protected tape after the completion of cutting and processing of the timber on which the protected tape was attached should be cleanly removed, there was a defect in the ice construction due to the remainder of the contact point on the wooden surface in the process of removing the protected tape by EP and EP (hereinafter “instant defect”).

3. Accordingly, the Plaintiff removed the protected tapes of timber supplied to E&S and E.S and removed the remaining contacteds or ices, and then re-issued the protected tapes supplied by E&B to E/S by re-putting them on timber and re-supply them to E/S.

In the process, the defendant supported the above defect treatment work of the plaintiff, and then the defendant's staff.