logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2013.07.24 2013고단1334
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who was a employee of C, and C is a corporation with the business purpose of non-ferrous metal sales in Chungcheongnam-nam Budget Group D, and E is a trade agency as a customer of C corporation.

1. Around August 29, 201, the Defendant: (a) indicated “C” and “F” in the name column of the form of deposit transaction application in a foreign exchange bank located in the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment of the establishment

In the proxy column of the proxy form that the Defendant continued to be kept in his/her place, the Defendant affixed his/her seal impression on the “A, G, Gyeonggi-do H, Staff,” “C (State),” “F” in the business registration number column, “F”, and “J” to the address column of Gyeonggi-do, and “J” to the phone number column, and then affixed his/her seal impression on C (State).

After forging an application for deposit transaction and power of attorney in the name of C Co., Ltd., a private document on rights and obligations, the Defendant submitted to an employee under the name of C Co., Ltd., who is unaware of the fact that the above application for deposit transaction and power of attorney were authentic.

2. Fraud;

A. A. Around February 2011, the Defendant made a false statement to the office of the Victim C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “victim Co., Ltd.”) located in the Chungcheong Budget-gun (hereinafter “Co., Ltd.”) that, although the victim Co., Ltd. was not obligated to pay the amount of money to E under the name of the guarantee fee, the victim Co., Ltd.’s representative L of the victim Co., Ltd. was able to import Aluminium from the Chinese Co., Ltd.’s M of the Chinese Co., Ltd.

On the other hand, the defendant has been engaged in export transactions to E representative N around that time.

There are cases where money is urgently needed, and 4% of the transaction amount is added in preparation for such case.

arrow