A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Criminal facts

On August 18, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Seoul Western District Court on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act at the Seoul Western District Court on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes on October 12, 2012 and one year and six months on February 21, 2014, respectively, and the execution of the final sentence has been terminated and the same criminal records have been exceeded several times.

1. On March 14, 2014, the Defendant, in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (thief) around 08:53, 08:53, 2014, at the counter of the Central Credit Union for the victim female employees located on the counter of the said employees, requested the said employees to exchange money, and then, the said employees requested the said employees to exchange money, and then collected money to help the payment of money in which approximately 30,000 won of cash owned by the victim was located on the counter while the said employees exchanged.

In addition, from time to time 10:00 on the same day, the Defendant stolen approximately KRW 63,000 in total on three occasions, such as the list of crimes in the attached Table, from time to time.

2. Around 17:30 on March 2, 2014, the Defendant suffered injury on the street in the front of Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, on the ground that he faced with the victim D (n, 40 years of age) where he was living there, and on the ground that he fell under the victim D (n, 40 years of age).

Summary of Evidence

[1] Paragraph (1) of the Defendant’s legal statement E, F, and G’s written evidence photographs: In light of the fact that all of the Defendant’s habitual thief crimes and habitual thief crimes in the judgment of each court are committed repeatedly in the judgment of one month after the Defendant was released from the same kind of crime, taking into account the fact that all of the Defendant’s habitual thief crimes and habitual thief crimes in the judgment of each court have collected money by taking advantage of the gaps of surveillance by banks, etc., and the Defendant committed repeated thief crimes in the judgment of only one month after being released from the same crime.