A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 5, 2006, the Defendant has been sentenced to a fine of KRW 5 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving in drinking), etc. at a site site located in the Suwon District Court in the Suwon District Court, and on August 16, 2012, a person who was sentenced to a fine of KRW 3 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving in drinking) at the port support of the Daegu District Court in the Daegu District Court on August 16, 2012. On July 27, 2013, the Defendant driven a Dstar cab car at the section of approximately 2 km in front of a police box located in the port located in the north-gu in the port located in the Dong-gu, Suwon District Court on the same road in the front of the port at the port located in the same Gu.

2. The Defendant, at the time and at the place specified in Paragraph 1, issued the driver’s license certificate of F, who is the relative student of the State, in order to confirm the identity of the Defendant, on the ground that the Defendant had driven alcohol at the same time and at a certain place, was confirmed to have a drinking response from the slope E belonging to the police box of the North Korean Port Police Station C, and was demanded to produce the driver’s license for the purpose of confirming the identity, and presented the driver’s license of F, which is the relative student of the State, so as not to reveal the fact that the Defendant had not been able to execute the fine. The instant report on the detection of the driver’s driver’s license presented by E, and written the “F” on the driver’

The Defendant stated that the primary driver detection report and the state situation report of the primary driver driver in which the signature of the F forged as above was written to E who knew of the forgery, as if the duly formed signature was written.

Accordingly, the defendant denied the official document, and forged the F's signature for the purpose of uttering, and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Notification of the results of regulating the driving of drinking, the circumstantial report of the driver of drinking, and inquiry into the results of regulating the driving of drinking;

1. A report on investigation (Cancellation of entry), a report on the detection of a primary driver and a report on the detection of a primary driver;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of written inquiries about criminal history and other Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Criminal facts;