Defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding 3.5 million won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be applied.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the defendant's wife, and when D was accused of criminal trial on the charge of the escape vehicle, D had the criminal trial on the charge of the escape vehicle, D had the intention to make D give false testimony in order to avoid criminal punishment.

On March 14:00 on March 31, 2016, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the case, such as violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Epiking Vehicles) against the above court Order 2015 Godan 4970, which was located in Gwangju-dong law-abiding District Court 7-12, Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-dong.

Defendant, at around November 19, 2015, driven a G luice car to the F Inspector belonging to the Mine Police Station E District, a police officer dispatched to the scene prior to the new site of the apartment construction site, even in the future where the Defendant was a luxian in Gwangju Mine-gu around November 23:30, 2015.

In spite of the statement, ① a police officer (F) who had been a witness before the commission, was asked the witness first to the witness, thereby driving the witness.

On the other hand, a police officer was driven by a male.

In addition, the witness has been moving to her husband with her husband and her husband.

(3) no longer than 10

The words “the Party has driven” did not extend to Korea-Mady.

The young police officer, first of all, dnicked by her husband(D).

The husband was "," and the husband was unable to answer it later, and the husband got out of the last place.

The author did not take out the phrase that he was driving.

2. The witness of the prosecutor’s “ and the witness of the prosecutor” has been driven by the police officer at the scene of the accident.

He had become aware of the question “I”.

“The testimony was made.”

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Copy of the examination record of witness examination of the F in relation to the defendant who has made a statement in court by the defendant;

1. A copy of the report in which the F is made by the prosecution concerning the traffic accident;