beta
Text
The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On February 2, 2016, the Defendant began to stay separately with the victim B, and tried to borrow money by taking a house where the Defendant and his/her children live, without paying living expenses, with the intent to borrow money as collateral, and had the victim receive money by arbitrarily preparing a sales contract of real estate in the name of the victim and selling the real estate.
1. On February 15, 2016, the Defendant forged a private document: (a) was not authorized by the victim to prepare a real estate sales contract in the name of the victim; (b) was written in the column for the location of the real estate sales contract by using a computer to use the computer for the purpose of exercising the right of the victim to prepare a real estate sales contract in the name of the victim; (c) was signed in the column for the location of the real estate sales contract; (d) on February 15, 2016; and (d) on February 15, 2016, in the column for the seller’s address, the seller’s name was signed in the column for the seller’s address; and (d) written in the column for the seller’s resident registration number, “E”; (e) written in the seller’s telephone number column; and (e) written in the seller’s name “B”;
Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a contract for real estate sales in the name of the victim, which is a private document on rights and duties.
2. On March 2, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at the Silung registry office located in Silung-si, Silung-si; (b) at the time of Silung-si, as described in paragraph (1), had the employees of G a certified judicial scrivener office in the name-unwritten name that knew of such fact file an application for ownership transfer registration; and (c) had the public official in the name-unregistered statement submitted as if he were the duly formed document.
3. The Defendant may be aware of the date and place indicated in paragraph (2), and the fact that the Defendant was not authorized to dispose of the real estate stated in paragraph (1) by the victim.