logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.04.10 2013고단358
모욕등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 25, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 19:15 on the Dong-gu Gwangju Building, the Defendant: (b) “In the process of drinking alcohol at the Cju store, D and scam attached to the vision; (c) in the Dong-gu Gwangju Building, the Defendant, who was dispatched upon receipt of a report, was under the control of the Escam F for the Dong Police Station Escam F for the Dong Police Station Escam and ten customers, and the above F was under the control of the Escam, “I are the police of our city, I are the same son, and I are raising the same scam. Escam. Escam.).” On the same day, the Defendant was arrested in a flagrant offender and sent to the Escam in the Dong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and continued to insult the police officers working at the said D and scam, the Defendant should make the said F’s voice to the said F.

2. On December 25, 2012, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, 20:33, the Defendant saw out of the police box while being examined at the above EM box, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties in relation to the investigation duties by assaulting the right face of the above H one time on the left side of the port.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement made with respect to F, H, and D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act of the relevant Article of the Criminal Act concerning the crime (the point of obstructing performance of official duties, the choice of imprisonment), and Article 311 of the Criminal Act;

1. From among concurrent crimes, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence for one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for the same kind of crime, even though the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence for one year and six months for the same type of crime, a summary order became final and conclusive on two occasions after the occurrence of the same crime.

Nevertheless, the Defendant committed the instant crime again.

The crime of this defendant is committed.

arrow