logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원포항지원 2016.01.12 2015가합125
채무부존재확인
Text

1. On June 8, 2010, the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) based on the construction contract between the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff).

Reasons

(b) 60 days thereafter.

7. Warranty liability: Two years from the date of completion; and

8. Defect guarantee rate: 10% of the contract amount.

C. In executing the instant construction project, the Plaintiff did not perform part of the construction work in accordance with the design drawings and specifications or performed the construction work in a defective manner, thereby incurring a total of KRW 103,670,380, as indicated below, in order to maintain and repair each of the following defects in the instant apartment complex.

(1) Repair items of defects (wons) 1-101, 102, 103-dong rooftop 8,68,00-2 101, 102-2, 103-2, 102 air conditioners at the bottom of 103-dong entrance doors 770,000 1-3 1-2 102 1-7 6-7 - 102 - 102 - 103 103 - 103 - 103 - 103 - 103 - 103 - 2 - 103 - 103 - 103 - 103 - 5 - 103 - 5 - 103 - 5 - 103 - 10 - 2 - 102 - 12 -2 100 -2 -12 -2 -2 -12 -12 -2 -2 -4 -4 -4 -4 -

2. Determination on the principal lawsuit and the cause of counterclaim

A. The plaintiff alleged by the parties as the principal lawsuit completed the construction of this case in accordance with the construction contract of this case. Since there is no defect in the apartment of this case, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant is confirmed as the non-existence of the defect repair liability, and the defendant.

arrow