logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 안동지원 2013.06.11 2013고단45
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등폭행)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 07:00 on November 6, 2012, the Defendant: (a) as the president of the FFF trade union, conducted an assembly at the port of the use of the cargo vehicles of the said company before the H site office in Ansan-si, Inc.; (b) conducted an assembly at the port of the use of the cargo vehicles of the said company; (c) discovered that the cargo vehicles of J 24 tons, which are the cargo vehicles of the victim I (the 28-year-old driver), enter the port of the said company, enter the port of the vehicle; and (d) destroyed the said cargo vehicles by driving the said cargo vehicles by driving the KFFK, which were located at the port of the said company; and (d) destroyed the said cargo vehicles by KRW 2,284,040.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of L or M;

1. Each police statement made to N or I;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigation report (such as a place where a case arises), a written estimate for repairing a victim vehicle;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Part concerning non-guilty or rejection of prosecution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the violation of Article 62 (1), the agreement with the victim, and the fact that there is no past record of punishment heavier than the

1. The Defendant, at around 07:00 on November 6, 2012, as the president of the FFFF trade union branch, discovered that the cargo 24 tons of J 24 tons, which is the cargo of the victim I (the age of 28) driving, enter the said company’s outer cargo vehicle, at the meeting of the H site office located in Ansan-dong, with the article of the said company, and damaged the said cargo 2,284,04,040 won at the same time, by driving the said cargo , which is a dangerous object, and thus, by driving the said cargo 2,284,040 won.

2. The Defendant and the defense counsel’s assertion does not constitute “hazardous objects” under Article 3(1) of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act.

3. Any of the goods to be determined are in danger of Article 3(1) of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act.

arrow