logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2019.07.10 2018고단2787
자동차관리법위반등
Text

Defendant

A listed in the attached list 1 to 99 of the crime sight table in attached Form 1 of the judgment of A.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

On March 17, 2016, A was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution on March 25, 2016 by the Jeonju District Court for violating the Trucking Transport Business Act.

1. No person who violates the Freight Trucking Services Act shall operate a trucking transport business without obtaining permission from the head of a Si/Gun/Gu as delegated by the Minister of Land, Infrastructure

In accordance with the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport’s notification, the Defendants traded general cargo vehicles for the transport business already permitted due to the suspension of the new transport business permission for the general cargo vehicles at low prices in the market. As the Defendants maintained the previous permission for the new transport business of the special purpose-type cargo vehicles for which the new transport business is permitted or already permitted, they replaced the vehicle with another vehicle whose age expires for the general trucking transport business with the existing special purpose-type cargo vehicles, without the need to obtain new permission, by increasing the number of general cargo vehicles for the transport business by making a report on the change of permission to the association of the regional trucking transport business without the need to obtain new permission, and then agreed to transfer the cargo at low prices.

As a result, the Defendants filed a report on the change in the car-type car of the tank type E, which is a general cargo vehicle, at the public service center of the D Association around December 23, 2015, while operating the truck transport company C, and the Defendants filed a report on the change in the car-type car of the tank type E, which is a general cargo vehicle.

However, since the permission for trucking transport business for the above tank glass vehicle is stipulated to be limited to the specific purpose-type cargo vehicle, the above permission cannot be substituted by a general cargo-type vehicle, despite the fact that the above tank glass vehicle can be confused with a general cargo vehicle, the Defendants are the general model from the beginning.

arrow