logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2019.12.06 2018구합88500
징계요구처분 취소 청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

. The operations were often carried out, and the circumstances were not to be omitted.

From September 26, 2016 to December 9, 2016, there was a limit to submitting a large amount of examination data within the due date while performing the duties inherent in the party team for up to 11 weeks.

(b) It is not delayed for the purpose of interfering with the inspection, but it will make every effort to prevent these days from occurring repeatedly in the future.

2. Details of data preparation and process by date;

(b) November 21 of the process process by date: The 14th: The head of the 2nd meeting related to the working method (the 5th meeting room: the director of the 2nd meeting, the director of the marketing-M division, the director of the corporation-N, the personnel-O, the general affairs-J): November 22, 14: On December 6, 198, the head of the 15th meeting: the request for the first data file (the director of the 14th meeting room): the meeting related to the standard amount (the base date of the goods) and the 14th meeting (the 14th meeting room: the director of the audit-L, the director of the 20th meeting, the director of the 16th anniversary of the corporate support-N, the head of the 2nd meeting, the personnel-O, and the head of the 2nd meeting): the total data subject to the 16th meeting related to the 2nd meeting (the total data subject to the 16th meeting): the 16th revision of the total data subject to the 26th meeting (the 16th meeting).

arrow