logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2013.04.29 2012고정1554
명예훼손
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On June 15, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 17:00, the facts charged: (b) around the E cafeteria near the Busan Metropolitan City D D hotel in Busan Metropolitan City; (c) at the time of the electrical construction of the hotel, the victim F, G, H, I, J, K, L, L, M, N, N, andO, who is an employee of the same hotel’s electrical department, arbitrarily disposed of the closed cable at the time of the electrical construction of the hotel; (d) did not have any profits therefrom; or (e) did not have any profits therefrom, or divided the profits remaining after using such profits therefrom, the Defendant had no electrical construction at the hotel center at the same hotel personnel team p and the head Q in 207 and 208; (c) at the same time, the closed cable generated was disposed of at the discretion under the direction of the NAFF, and damaged the entire employees of the electricity room by openly pointing out the fact that the remaining profits were 100,000 won per capita.

2. According to the witness’s legal statement, the statement of the police preparation for P and Q, etc., the Defendant: (a) as an employee in charge of the management of the flag of the hotel hotel's office around June 15, 2012, the Defendant asked the personnel team staff P and Q to investigate the corruption of the employees of the hotel; and (b) P and Q reported this fact only to the upper part of the hotel; (c) the personnel team of the hotel was in charge of general affairs, personnel affairs, labor affairs, and duties; and (d) the fact that the hotel employees of the hotel reported to the personnel team when they accused the internal corruption, the above act of the Defendant cannot be recognized as a performance of defamation; and (e) there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise.

Therefore, the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, and thus, is acquitted under the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure

arrow