Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,00,00,00 for six months of imprisonment for Defendant B.

, however, the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B The farming association corporation is a corporation established mainly for the manufacturing industry, such as medicinal and consigned, in South Won-si, and the defendant A is the representative director of the above farming association.

1. No person who sells or provides agricultural and fishery products or the processed products thereof of Defendant A after cooking them shall place a false indication of origin or place a false indication of origin likely to cause confusion therewith;

Nevertheless, from April 2014 to August 2014, the Defendant manufactured “D physiological glass” mixed with 80% of rice and 20% of rice in the pertinent agricultural partnership. The Defendant, even if manufactured in combination with 77% of rice in the Republic of Korea and 23% of imported acid, made an indication that all of the rice used in a glass in a product label may cause confusion as if it were domestically produced, and sold the above 74,160 disease (sale KRW 47,96,00) in total as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes.

2. Defendant B, a representative of the Defendant, committed the act of falsely indicating the origin as above in relation to the Defendant’s business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A written confirmation (E);

1. A written corrective order, on-site, and product photographs;

1. A detailed statement of each ban;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (Presentation of transaction account books), investigation report (report on details of revision to the list of crimes);

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

(a) Defendant A: Articles 15 and 6 (2) 1 of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products;

(b) Defendant B farming association corporation: Articles 17, 15, and 6(2)1 of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products;

1. Defendant A who is subject to suspended execution: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B farming association corporation: Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

1. Defendant A

(a) the scope of recommendations according to the sentencing guidelines (decision of type), food health crimes, false labelling, and