logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.06.12 2018나2052687
공유물분할
Text

1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

3. The judgment of the court of first instance is ordered.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing this case is that the reasoning of the judgment is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following modifications, thereby citing it as is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Revision] Part 4 to 7 of Part 3 of Part 4 of the first instance court's decision "each real estate listed in the above real estate list 1 has been owned by Defendant B 2,45, 310, 326/8, 478, 378, 690 of the above real estate list; Defendant C owned 2,415,154,656/8, 478, 378, 690 of the above real estate list; Defendant C owned 1,73,829, 555/8, 478, 378, 690 of the above real estate list; and Defendant C owned 7,335,930,979/25, 979/25, 436, 070 of the above real estate list; Defendant C owned 7,246/25,496/25, 471, 375; 375/147,5.7

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and all appeals by the defendants are dismissed without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition of the judgment of the court of first instance.

Since it is obvious that the share ratio of each claim is an erroneous calculation, it is decided as per Disposition by the decision to correct it.

arrow