A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Around 12:10 on October 21, 2019, the Defendant, at the conference room, held a meeting of “C” in the following cities: (a) the statement of the victim D (Nam, 64 years of age) was contrary to his/her own opinion; (b) went against the victim D’s opinion; and (c) continued to go against the said victim D; (d) continued to go against the victim E (Nam, 60 years of age) with a dangerous object that is a dangerous object that may harm the victim E (ma, 60 years of age); (c) had the victim D with the face face; (d) around 14 days of the need for medical treatment; and (e) approximately 10 days of the snow soft, snow, snow, gale, and other ethic injury, gypt, and injury to the victim E, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Partial statement of witness E;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate (E) and the injury diagnosis certificate (D);

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Social Service Order and the defense counsel had only once the defendant got the chair D.

살피건대, 이 법원이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하면, E이 이 사건 범행 직후 경찰 조사에서 피고인이 의자를 2회 던졌다고 진술하였을 뿐만 아니라, 병원에서도 튕겨져 나오는 의자에 맞았다고 진술하지 않고, 던지는 의자에 맞았다고 진술한 사실이 인정되고, 한편 E의 법정진술이 이와 모순된다 하더라도, 증인의 기억은 시간이 지날수록 희미해질 수 있는 점에 비추어 볼 때, 사건 직후 있었던 E의 수사기관에서의 진술을 더 신뢰할 수 있으므로,...