A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Around 03:00 on June 3, 2012, the Defendant, while drinking alcohol within the main point of “D” located in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, on the ground that the e-mail drinking on the side table was fluenced against the Defendant’s shoulder, etc., and that the e-mail drinking on the side table was fluenced against the Defendant’s shoulder, etc., the Defendant and the Defendant were punished by the fluor who did not receive any dangerous object, etc. (the bridge is a steel system) by divating the e-mail to the head, thereby gathering the fluence toward the above e-mail. The Defendant put the victim “other open head part” under the number of days of treatment to the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The statement of a witness G, F, H and I in the third protocol of the trial, the statement of a witness J in the seventh protocol of the trial, the statement of a witness E in the nine protocol of the trial;

1. Each statement of G, F, H, and I;

1. Each medical certificate and each general medical report;

1. Each photograph and nursing information investigation room [the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, namely, not only G who is the victim and the main employee, but also I, a neutral witness, present at an investigative agency and court, and stated that the victim was injured by the victim because the victim was a deceased person. There is no reason unfavorable to the above witness, and the witness E's statement in the court also corresponds to criminal facts as it corresponds to the fact that the defendant was dead and the victim was injured. On the other hand, K, L, and M, which were at the time of the defendant's daily activity, stated to the effect that there was no intention of the defendant and there was no fact that the victim was injured, but also did not make any statement about the situation that the victim was injured (such as the location of the family information investigation station, etc.) and stated that the customer was also a deceased person immediately after the document prepared by the victim was prepared.