1. The part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid under the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked.

The defendant.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. With respect to A vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff vehicle”), the Defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to B vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

B. On July 2, 2015, at around 14:55, C driving the Plaintiff’s vehicle and proceeding in accordance with a one-lane in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E, as bankruptcy from D to D, and the said road went into the right-hand part of the Defendant’s right-hand part of the F Driving’s Defendant’s vehicle that was bypassed to the same direction at the right-hand side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle while the said road came into the right-hand part at the three-distance intersection where the bankruptcy is met and the right-hand part of the said road came into the right-hand part of the said road.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). C.

On July 23, 2015, the Plaintiff paid KRW 6,870,000 as the repair cost for the Plaintiff’s vehicle due to the instant accident.

[Reasons for Recognition] Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6 (including paper numbers), Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 4, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff's vehicle was driving along the right side of the road while looking at the movement of the preceding vehicle to enter the right side of the road in order to make a right side as a result of bankruptcy, but the defendant's vehicle was making a right side of the vehicle in the same direction as the left side of the plaintiff's vehicle while making a right-hand side to the plaintiff's vehicle, and the accident of this case occurred by shocking the plaintiff's vehicle. Thus, the defendant is obliged to pay the above insurance amount of KRW 6,870,000 paid by the plaintiff in relation to the accident of this case caused by the whole negligence of the defendant's vehicle as above.

In regard to this, the defendant's vehicle driving ahead of the plaintiff's vehicle and was waiting at the above Sam-distance Intersection. The defendant's vehicle found the defendant's vehicle which is stopped on the front side and did not temporarily reduce or temporarily suspend the speed.