beta
Text
1. The Defendant: (a) 27,000,000 won to Plaintiff B; (b) 18,000,000 won to Plaintiff C; (c) 5,000,000 won to Plaintiff D; and (d) 5,000 won to Plaintiff E.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The parties 1) Plaintiff B is the G Hospital at F Medical University G Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).
(A) the network A (hereinafter referred to as “the network”) being treated by the person;
The deceased’s spouse, the Plaintiff C is the deceased’s heir who took over the deceased during the instant lawsuit as his child, and the Plaintiff D is the deceased’s father, and the Plaintiff E is the mother of the deceased. 2) The Defendant is a juristic person operating the Defendant hospital.
B. On May 29, 2014, the Deceased was diagnosed as having shown symptoms that it seems that the Plaintiff gave birth to the Defendant Hospital, and was found to have scarcitys on the chests. On October 6, 2014, the medical staff of the Defendant Hospital was diagnosed as having had scarcitys from the medical staff of the Defendant Hospital. (2) On October 16, 2014, around 15:11, 201, the medical staff of the Defendant Hospital was diagnosed as having had scarcitys from the Defendant Hospital. (3) Around October 16, 2014, the medical staff of the Defendant Hospital was diagnosed as having scar-CT (PE-C inspection of the instant case) (hereinafter “PE-C inspection”).
3) The medical staff of the Defendant Hospital diagnosed the Deceased as a syasthenia Gravis and decided to perform scarcity removal surgery. (C) The medical staff of the Defendant Hospital began to anesthesia the Deceased around 11:35 on October 17, 2014, for the removal of scarcity, around 12:09 to 18:26 on the part of the Deceased.
2) During the instant surgery, the medical professionals at Defendant Hospital: (a) at the time of the instant surgery, at the time of stuffing a main disease station being milked with the normal beer; (b) damaged the aspect of the beer and the commercial beer; and (c) in the process, the instant surgery mixed with the ordinary beer, but, in which the instant surgery was conducted, blood transfusion occurred (hereinafter “the instant outer blood”).
(3) The medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital was not measured with the blood pressure of the Deceased due to the instant blood transfusion from 14:25 to the heart pressure.