A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of B-b Poter cargo vehicles.

On May 27, 2016, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle around 14:10 on May 27, 2016, and proceeded with the flyingpass road of 418, Gumi Mami-si, which is located in 418, with two lanes, from the surface of the oil reservoir to the surface of the oil reservoir, and changed its course to one lane.

In this case, the driver has a duty of care to safely change the course of driving service by taking into account the traffic conditions of the vehicle that he/she intends to change.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went through a single lane as it was due to the negligence of entering the same lane as it was, and instead, received the part before the right side of the victim C (W, 45 years old) driving, which was driven by the victim C (W, 45 years old), with the right side of the said cargo loaded on the left side of the said cargo vehicle.

Defendant 1 caused damage to 256,364 won of the repair cost, such as the exchange of pentums, to the right-hand side by occupational negligence as above. At the time, Defendant 1 left the said cargo vehicle and escaped without immediately stopping it as it was a situation in which the risk of a new traffic accident is likely to occur, even if the said cargo was concealed by the victim of the said accident.

2. On May 27, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) driving a B Poter truck without a driver’s license on the section of approximately 6km from the front of the commercial road to the front of the factory in the Gumi-si 1, which is located in the Gumi-si, via the above scatteringpass road instead of in the Gumi-si, Simi-si Line, on May 14:10, 201.

3. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act, at the same time and place as Paragraph 2, operated B Poter freight without mandatory insurance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Report on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. Photographs and estimate of the damaged vehicle;

1. The driver's license ledger;

1. Making inquiries into teas and mandatory insurance; 1.