1. The defendant

(a) Category 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1, respectively, on the first floor of the building listed in the separate sheet.

1. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. In full view of the facts that there is no dispute between the parties and the purport of the entire arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6, the plaintiff is the owner of the building listed in the separate sheet, and the plaintiff and C (hereinafter the plaintiff et al.) entered into a lease agreement with the defendant on August 10, 2013 that the plaintiff et al. sent to the defendant about 21 square meters of the unit of the building listed in the separate sheet No. 1,2, 3, 44, and 100,000 won for lease deposit (hereinafter the "the store of this case") and about 10,000,000 won for lease deposit and about 10,000 won for rent No. 70,000 (excluding value-added tax, 10,000 won for each month) and 20,0000 won for lease period from August 10, 2013 to August 9, 2015.

B. According to the above facts of recognition, the instant lease agreement was terminated due to the Defendant’s failure to pay two or more rents on October 30, 2015, when the written request for the surrender of real estate by the Plaintiff, etc. was delivered to the Defendant.

Therefore, barring any special circumstance, the Defendant is obligated to order the Plaintiff, the owner of the instant store and the lessor, to leave the instant store, and to pay the amount calculated at the rate of KRW 770,000 per month from July 10, 2015 to the date of completion of the name order of the instant store.

2. Conclusion :