logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원진주지원 2016.05.25 2015가합11642
건물명도
Text

1. The defendant against the plaintiffs

(a)board which connects each point of Appendix 1(A), 2, 3, 4 and 1(A) in sequence.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On July 10, 2015, the Plaintiffs, as the owners of each of the buildings listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (A) and the building listed in the separate sheet No. 165.29m29m2 (hereinafter “the building No. 1”) connected each of the items in the separate sheet No. 1,2, 3, 4, and 1 (hereinafter “the building No. 2”) and the separate sheet No. 2, including the lease deposit amount of KRW 50,000,000 (including additional tax), monthly rent of KRW 11,00,000 (including additional tax), lease term of KRW 2,00 from August 15, 2015 to August 15, 2016, each of the lease agreements stipulated in the separate sheet No. 1, 2015 (hereinafter “the lease term of this case”) and the separate lease agreements (hereinafter “No. 1,010 to May 16, 2015).

B. The Plaintiffs had delivered each of the instant buildings to the Defendant following the conclusion of each of the instant lease agreements, but the Defendant occupied and used each of the instant buildings without paying monthly rent under the instant lease agreement and monthly rent under the instant lease agreement since October 2015.

C. On December 16, 2015, the Plaintiffs terminated each of the instant lease agreements and received a complaint against the Defendant on the grounds that the Defendant was in arrears for at least two months a monthly rent under each of the instant lease agreements. The Plaintiffs were served on the Defendant on February 16, 2016.

On the other hand, the amount equivalent to the monthly rent of each of the instant buildings after the termination of each of the instant lease agreements is the same as the monthly rent under each of the instant lease agreements.

arrow