1. According to the expansion of the purport of the claim by this court, the judgment of the first instance is modified as follows.

The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a person who owns the land indicated in the annexed land list.

B. The Defendant’s husband He, around 1995, took over the right of lease on the 64.8 square meters of the land listed in the separate sheet of land from the former lessee F, and entered into a contract with the Plaintiff to lease the 1 building of this case on October 1995, after entering into an agreement with the Plaintiff to lease the 1 building of this case, he operated the 64.8 square meters of land among the land listed in the annexed sheet of land from the former lessee F.

After that, in 2007, the lease deposit was set at KRW 50 million and annual rent was set at KRW 500,000,000, respectively.

C. The network E occupied and used the land (6.36 square meters (20 square meters (20 square meters) in the land indicated in the attached Table list of the land in the attached Table) adjacent to the building site of this case as a restaurant site, and entered into a contract between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff in around 2003 to pay 50,000,000 won per annum under the name of rent for the said land without a deposit. The lease was renewed at intervals of one to two years, and the lease was set at 550,000 won per annum on January 1, 207.

After that, in 2010, as the network E died, the Defendant succeeded to the lessee status of the building No. 1 and the land No. 2 and operated the said restaurant.

E. The Defendant concluded a lease renewal agreement with the Plaintiff regarding the instant building No. 1 and the instant building No. 2 by December 31, 2015, between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff on January 2015.

F. On August 31, 2015 and November 24, 2015, the Plaintiff sent to the Defendant a certificate of content that it would not renew the lease of the instant building No. 1. Thus, the Plaintiff sent to the Defendant a certificate of content that the said building will be clarified until December 31, 2015, which is the end of the contract.

G. Meanwhile, the Defendant did not pay since 201 the instant land as to the instant land No. 2, and as to the instant building No. 1 since 2016.