1. Of the judgment of the first instance court, the claims for a corrective statement against Defendant C shall be modified as follows:

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except in the following cases. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

▣ 제1심 판결문 이유 중의 “별지 1”을 이 판결문의 [별지 1]과 같이 고친다.

▣ 제1심 판결문 11쪽 5째 줄의 "피고들이"부터 7째 줄 마지막 부분까지를 다음과 같이 고친다.

Only with the descriptions of the evidence Nos. 2 and 4, it is insufficient to recognize that the Defendants have a reasonable ground to believe that the facts alleged through the article of this case are true, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claims of this case are accepted in the above recognition scope, and the remaining claims shall be dismissed as they are without merit.

In the judgment of the first instance court, the part on the claim for a corrective statement against Defendant C was partially different, and thus, the above part on the claim for a corrective statement is partially accepted by the above Defendant’s appeal and modified as above.

Since the part concerning the claim for damages in the judgment of the court of first instance is consistent with the above conclusion, all appeals filed by the defendants and incidental appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.