logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.10.04 2019나50241
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

3. The judgment of the court of first instance is delivered with "2,820."

Reasons

1. The reasons why the court should explain this case are the same as the reasons stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the following parts, we accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The height of the body of the first instance court shall close the fifth upper part of the judgment with the following table:

(B) Calculation of the fifth sentence of the first instance court: 2,120,496 won = Property damage 5,953,963 won - 3,83,467 won of mutual aid after mutual aid = 1,409,514 won = Property damage - 5,242,981 won - 3,83,467 won after mutual aid.

The 6th sentence of the first instance judgment "2,820,496 won (property damage 2,120,496 won)" is "2,109,514 won (property damage 1,409,514 won)" (property damage 1,409,514 won).

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is justified within the above scope of recognition, and the remaining claims shall be dismissed as it is without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just as it is concluded, the defendant's appeal shall be dismissed. Since it is obvious that "2,820,496 won" in Paragraph 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance is a clerical error of "2,109,514 won" due to erroneous calculation, it shall be corrected ex officio. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow