1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) paid KRW 5,859,000 to the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) and the amount from January 2, 2008 to December 8, 2011.

The main lawsuit, counterclaim is also considered.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. A. On January 2, 2008, B caused a traffic accident where, on the backway, a house in front of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul (DK) was driven by the Plaintiff’s “E” car (owner and the insured F), the insured vehicle in front of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul at the side of the backway, and G’s house was maintained by unification from the alleyway to the alleyway, and the Defendant’s frame and parts of the Y, where the house was coming at the roadside at the right edge of the vehicle in front of the end of the above year, and the house was driven by the erop as a result of the unification.

B. The defendant suffered injury from three weeks' diagnosis due to the above traffic accident, such as "Gyeong-gu Maumk Maumk Maumk Maumk Maumk Maumk Maumk Maumk Maumk Maumk Maumk Maume," 0 days from the date of the accident to February 12, 2008, and the defendant received hospital treatment for 42 days from the date of the accident at the I Hospital located in Jung-gu, Seoul, and received hospital treatment for 76 days from November 24, 2008.

D. The degree of disability (1) was diagnosed by the Defendant as a sick person in the I Hospital immediately after the instant traffic accident, such as “satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satum”

00 However, at the time of physical examination, the Systop Hospital Mastop Hospital Mastop Mastop Mastop Mastop Mastop Mastop Mastop Mastop Mastop Mastop Mastop Mas to the Defendant’s physical examination. On the other hand, the Defendant’s symptoms were diagnosed as Mastop Mastop Mastop and Mastop Mastop Mastop Mastop Mas to the right and left-hand, on the other hand, on the ground that there is any limitation on the scope of the movement on the right and the left-hand-hand, and that there is no connection between the above symptoms and the traffic accident of this case, which the Defendant

0. Meanwhile, according to the fact-finding inquiry letter to the chief of the National Health Insurance Corporation's regional headquarters, the defendant has several years prior to the instant traffic accident.