beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for eight months.
, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On June 21, 2013, around 17:20, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the Defendant’s detention case against the Daegu District Court No. 230, Daegu District Court Decision No. 230, Yongsan-gu, Daegu District Court Decision No. 2013DaMa350, the Defendant stated to the effect that “the Defendant (B) was absent a witness from forced execution of his/her car, and the Defendant was her head, only 1, and the Defendant was her head, and the Defendant did not have a witness’s telephone, and instead did not have a witness’s telephone, and was her head was humped and brought to a hump phone.” When the police was the police vehicle, the Defendant was able to borrow money to his/her parents.
However, the fact was that B forced the Defendant to leave a car car, and B took the Defendant several times at that place, and prevented the Defendant from leaving the container, and B did not turn back all of the Defendant’s cell phone equipment after cutting off.
Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.
2. When the driver’s license was revoked on the ground that Defendant B committed a crime using a motor vehicle as the Defendant’s prosecuted case rendered by the said Daegu District Court Branch Decision 2013Ma350, Defendant B had had the victim of the said case interfered with the purport of “not having been detained using a motor vehicle.”
On May 11, 2013, the Defendant contacted with the above A to the effect that “the Defendant was notified of the revocation of the driver’s license by receiving the fine in the instant case, and voluntarily visiting the vehicle to the effect that the driver’s license is not revoked.” On June 17, 2013, at an attorney E-law office located in Daegu-gu, Seo-gu, Daegu-gu, to the effect that “this content is too excessive,” and the Defendant’s statement of the police with A is examined in the court.