A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than four months and by a fine not exceeding 300,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 3, 2015, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) entered the D police box located in Pyeongtaek-si C on December 3, 2015; (b) and (c) died of the police officer at the place where the police box was drunk.

“A police officer’s outer marbling gun marbling with hand, and sarbling the gun marbling with approximately 30 minutes of a very rough horse and behavior, such as tear.

2. On December 4, 2015, the Defendant: (a) was investigated as a person subject to the violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act in relation to the case described in paragraph (1) at the F of the 67 Pyeongtaek-si Police Station at the central office of Pyeongtaek-si Police Station F and office around 08:14, 2015; and (b) printed out the suspect interrogation protocol by the Gyeong G and printed out the suspect interrogation protocol to the Y for the purpose of exercising the right of defense of the Defendant; (c) however, it appears that there is no disadvantage to the Defendant’s exercise of the right of defense, thereby ex officio adding the above phrase.

The suspect’s signature column at the lower end indicated “H” as “H,” and then delivered it to G with the seal attached thereto.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged H’s signature and used forged signature.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Copy of the protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant (the name of H);

1. A report on internal investigation (the process of the receipt of the instant case) and a written statement of the main offender (the Defendant, under the influence of alcohol at the time of committing the instant crime, asserts that he was in a state of mental or physical loss or mental weakness

However, according to the records of this case, although the defendant's drinking is recognized as having drinking at the time, it is not deemed that the defendant has no or weak ability to discern things due to drinking, and therefore, the above assertion is without merit.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant provisions of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act and Article 3(3)1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the fact that the revocation of the official order and the selection of fines) concerning the facts constituting the crime;