Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and by a fine of 300,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant violating the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) was urged by the police box located in Yongsan-gu Seoul on May 5, 2016 from around 00:20 to around 00:50; (b) the police box located in Yongsan-gu in Yongsan-gu; (c) the police box was sent to the toilet while under the influence of alcohol; and (d) the police box was sent to the police box without any justifiable reason to return home from the police box D; and (c) the Defendant was urged by the police box to spaw off the spaws without being sealed.

“,” and “police dogbling such fakes, which are flusing to be fluored,” the cherbly expressed, “Absing to be fluored,” and that the cherb was fluored by the cherb, who would be prevented from smoking tobacco inside the cherb in the box, and followed the cherb to be removed from E.

Accordingly, the defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, forced or scamed by very rough words and conducts at government offices.

2. On May 5, 2016, the Defendant signed a private signature: (a) around 02:10, at the criminal office of the Yongsan-gu Police Station located in Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, 89:24, the Defendant entered the name and resident registration number of the Defendant, and entered “G” in the statement column of the suspect interrogation protocol prepared by the said F in order to conceal the fact that he/she was under suspicion of violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, and was under suspicion of violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged the above G name’s signature without authority.

3. The Defendant, at the time, place, and with the intention to exercise the right specified in paragraph (2), submitted the signature of the above G name entered in the above interrogation record to F, without authority, as if the signature of the above G name was duly formed, and the above F, without authority, had the signature of the forged G name be affixed to the investigation record, thereby allowing the F to bind the interrogation record in which the name was forged.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A statement of control of D;

1. A damaged photograph;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the place of criminal (additional acknowledgement) and the investigation report (an investigation related to the forgery of a signature of the company);

1. Relevant provisions of the Act concerning facts constituting an offense;