Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 13, 2010, the Defendant, at the cost of repair of the victim D in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City around April 13, 2010, lent KRW 5 million to the victim “I am fe-gu E needs to be cut off due to a short-term defect.”

“A false representation was made.”

However, while the Defendant continued to borrow money from the damaged party, the Defendant intended to pretend to borrow money from another person who did not pay the debt from the damaged party as if he/she borrowed money from the damaged party, and the Defendant was able to use the money immediately received from the victim E.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, stated 5 million won in the indictment of this case through the bank account under the name of Korea under the name of Korea bank account from the victim as the borrowed money, but this appears to be a clerical error, so the Defendant shall make a correction as above (the Defendant continued to make a pleading on the premise that the money transferred under the name of E is KRW 5 million). The Defendant was issued a written notice.

2. On April 21, 2010, the Defendant: (a) around April 21, 2010, at the place described in paragraph (1) above, “F engaged in the same work as B is closed for the sale of insurance, and only if money is insufficient, she will return it immediately.

“A false representation was made.”

However, while the Defendant continued to borrow money from the damaged party, the Defendant was trying to pretend to borrow money from another person who did not pay the debt from the injured party as if he borrowed money from the injured party, and the Defendant was able to use the money immediately.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, was given KRW 7 million through the bank account in the name of F under the name of F as a loan from the victim, and received KRW 4 million under the same name on May 15, 2010.

3. On September 30, 2010, the Defendant: (a) around September 30, 2010, at the place described in the foregoing paragraph (1) above, stated that “G and H engaged in the same work as B are closed; (b) there is a shortage of money to go back, and immediately return it to the victim.

“A false representation was made.”

(b).