(영문) 청주지방법원 2018.02.02 2017고정689

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 청주지방법원 2018.02.02 2017고정689

실화

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Between 02:00 on 02.22. 02. 02. 02. 02. 02. 02. 02. 02. 02.30, the Defendant sprinked the freezing sprink in the building C, the building C, the building C, in the building C, which contains edible milk, with smelling in a large scale, and sprinked the sprink, without completely turning the electric revenue.

Due to the above negligence of the defendant 1, the smells, 08:40 on the same day, which were fluorized with the smells around the above 08:40 on the same day, fluored with the smells, and fluoring with the above 304 on the whole.

Ultimately, the Defendant destroyed the victim D’s market value of KRW 14,020,000 within 304,00.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Fire site photographs and responses to requests for appraisal;

1. Written estimate;

1. The report(fire) and internal investigation report(net 4) (the Defendant and his defense counsel) found that the Defendant was diving with a fresh with a fresh with a fresh with a fresh of food oil, and that the fire occurred within the house due to the fresh of the electricity of this case. However, despite the installation of a heating prevention device on the above fresh, the Defendant’s defense counsel asserted that the occurrence of the fire does not result from the Defendant’s negligence and that the occurrence of the fire is due to the defect in the electricity itself and the occurrence of the fire is not due to the Defendant’s negligence. However, according to the evidence duly adopted and duly examined by the court, if the main container was in operation under a freshing safety control system installed on the power line of the electricity fresh, even if the main container installed at the fresh of the electricity fresh operated normally, it can be found that the inside of the main container could have been overheatedd in the process of the final process of power supply and blocking.

It is not possible to determine whether the safety control device has been operated normally due to the fire of the rupture and the inspection of appraisal materials, but the function of the electric recognition is above the normal operation.

유사 판례

-서울남부지방법원 2017.04.14 2016고정1468

-수원지방법원 2016.05.31 2014가합63561 (1)

-대법원 1994. 3. 11. 선고 93도3001 판결

-특허법원 2005.10.27.선고 2004허8732 판결

-의정부지방법원 2011.8.11.선고 2009고단2685 판결