logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2019.01.18 2017나9629
손해배상
Text

1. All appeals filed by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) on the principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be principal lawsuit and counterclaim.

Reasons

1. The main issue of the instant case cited in the judgment of the court of first instance is the time of the discontinuance of the instant construction, whether the parties to the discontinuance of construction, whether the parties to the discontinuance of construction, the compensation for delay, and the progress of construction performed by the defendant at the time of the discontinuance of construction. The judgment of this court is the same as the conclusion of

The reasoning for this Court’s reasoning is as follows: (a) the evidence submitted by the Defendant in the trial and lack of recognition of the Defendant’s assertion is the same as the reasoning of the first instance judgment, except for the rejection of each description of evidence Nos. 11, 12, which is insufficient to acknowledge the Defendant’s assertion; and (b) therefore, (c) the same shall be

2. According to the conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable, and all appeals against the defendant's principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow