logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.12.22 2015고단2074
사기
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, with respect to Defendant C, the same shall apply for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is the owner of the H 401 floor in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the defendant C is a licensed real estate agent.

Defendant

C on August 2012, 2012, through the Internet website, grants a full-time loan to Defendant B a license fee. “I propose to commit a crime and inform Defendant B of the contact point of the loan hub, which is a name-free winner,” one time.

On the other hand, while Defendant A was aware of a loan, he heard that he could obtain a loan from the above Internet site through the above Internet site, which is a person without the name of the beneficiary. The Defendants continued to conclude a false lease contract with Defendant B on the real estate in his name, so as to obtain a loan from the bank after having concluded a false lease contract with Defendant B.

Accordingly, on August 2012, Defendant C prepared a false lease contract as if Defendant B and Defendant A entered into a real lease contract with respect to the said real estate from the J real estate operated by Defendant C located in Seoul, on the one hand, in which Defendant C and Defendant C were brokers in the name of brokers, and Defendant B and Defendant A filed an application for a loan with the National Housing Fund accompanied by a false lease contract, even though they did not intend to rent a house as stated in the above lease contract, in the process of applying for a loan of the National Housing Fund at the broker in the name of the broker in name and at the 3rd point of the Victim Bank located in Seoul and the 29 August 29, 2012 at the 3rd point of the Victim Bank located in Seoul U.S. on the other hand, Defendant C acted

Accordingly, on September 3, 2012, the Defendants conspired with the Defendant’s name broker, and thus, were transferred KRW 70 million from the victim to the national bank account in the name of Defendant B.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A and B’s respective legal statements, and part of Defendant C’s said statements.

arrow