Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, with respect to Defendant L, the above punishment shall be imposed for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B On May 2, 2013, the Seoul Southern District Court was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud, and is currently detained in Seoul Southern District Court.

1. At around 13:55 on November 23, 201, Defendant B was on the backwards of the F A-Apon-car 7, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, on the road near the bridge, and there was no traffic accident attributable to D, which is driven by D, and there was no flight on the said date.

Nevertheless, the defendant conspired with the above A and received an accident from the insurance company as if he had suffered a traffic accident while driving the car of the above A, and received the insurance money and the agreement.

On November 23, 201, 201, the date and time of the above insurance fraud in an investigative agency, the Defendant confirmed that the location of the Defendant’s mobile phone K’s base station around November 13, 201, at around 13:55, was other than the vicinity of the bridge in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, where the location of the base station of the Defendant’s mobile phone is the site of the accident, and the Defendant used his mobile phone at the time of the accident. In order to care for the Defendant’s use of his mobile phone L, the Defendant was

Therefore, on January 21, 2013, the Defendant applied for L as a witness through an attorney-at-law in his Seoul Southern District Court Decision 2012Da4394 Decided January 21, 2013, the Defendant requested L to the effect that L was able to obtain the Defendant’s mobile phone, and that L was able to obtain the Defendant’s mother’s or female-child counsel, etc., and that L was able to obtain the Defendant’s mobile phone, and that L was able to obtain the Defendant’s mobile phone, and that it was able to obtain the Defendant’s mother’s or female-child counsel, etc., even though L was not able to use the aforementioned mobile phone from the Defendant.

The above L, upon request of the defendant, will be perjury.