The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.

Process of Litigation

A. The lower court found the Defendants guilty of the violation of the Act on Specialized Credit Financial Business, such as the facts charged under paragraph (2) below, and sentenced each of the following punishments.

B. The judgment of the court below prior to the remand appealed the defendants on the grounds that the sentencing was unfair, and the judgment prior to the remand was dismissed respectively.

(c)

The judgment of the court of first instance before the remand was remanded to the defendant, and the Supreme Court reversed and remanded the judgment of the court prior to the remand after ex officio judgment.

2. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case was presented by Defendant B, at the beginning of 2012, from the name unexplosers of the card tin-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-airing-open-open-open-open-open-airing-open-open-open-open-open-open-open-nameing-open-nameing-open-open-open-open-nameing-open-nameing-open-open-nameing-open-open-nameing-open-nameing-open-nameing-open-name who would be able to receive a fee and receive a fee.

Accordingly, on August 20, 2013, the above person who was absent from his name made a loan to I via Defendant B, through Defendant B, to obtain the information on the payment of local tax from J, which is the client of the above certified judicial scrivener office. After I's card, 1,3,930,000 won, 2,430,000 won, 2,000 won with a new card, 1,393,000 won, 8,000 won with a new card, and 2,430,000 won as the above local tax payment, and around that time, Defendant was paid in cash from J as local tax payment.