The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the penalty (the fine of KRW 12 million, confiscation, and additional collection of KRW 990,000) imposed by the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is divided in depth by recognizing the defendant's mistake, and there is no criminal history. However, although the court below seems to have determined the defendant's punishment by reducing the fine amount in accordance with the summary order by fully considering the above circumstances, considering the above circumstances, the act of arranging sexual traffic is harmful to the good customs by commercializing women's sex, and there are no significant harm to society. Thus, it is necessary to strictly punish the defendant in order to block the intermediate intermediary between the sexual traffic supplier and the intermediary, and other circumstances that are conditions for the punishment indicated in the records, such as the motive and circumstance leading to the crime in this case, the circumstances before and after the crime, the defendant's age, character and conduct, occupation, occupation, and family relationship, the punishment imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.