Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On February 12, 2017, around 01:15, the Defendant was forced to return home from the police officers belonging to the C District Department of the Dacheon Police Station, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol in front of the front door of the first apartment apartment house, 205 blue-gu, Cheongcheon-si, Cheongcheon-gu, 205.

The Defendant, at its place, was forced from the police officers belonging to C District Armed Forces, tried not to put the police, put the police, put the police into force, and was next to the police.

C Omission of why it is ‘darbly’ from the Radar of the District;

It is why it is about to go to the House.

“Absing the horses to the effect that “, in his hand, assaulted the said D’s part of the said D’ at once, thereby obstructing the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the 112 Report Report.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. E statements;

1. Investigation report (reporter telephone conversations, etc.) and investigation report (to hear statements from the police station called out);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs taken by affected police officers;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the defendant's age, occupation, sex, family relationship, and the circumstances before and after the crime, under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order, shall be determined as ordered by taking into account the following circumstances:

The fact that the police officer who was dispatched after receiving a report is assaulted to interfere with the execution of his duties, confession and reflect, the fact that the victim police officer is able to search for the damaged police officer, and the fact that the victim police officer deposits money with the person who was commissioned to do so, has no record of the same crime, and there is no record of the same crime.