A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 1, 2017, the Defendant: (a) on September 1, 2017, in front of the D parking lot located in Chuncheon-si C; (b) on September 1, 2017, the Defendant lost the

At the same time, the police officer F of the Chuncheon Police Station E District of the Chuncheon Police Station recommended a taxi engineer to take a trial fee and return home because he/she was dispatched after receiving a report from 112 that he/she had a trial fee for the taxi engineer, and the police officer was urged by F to go home to the defendant, but he/she continued to look back to the above F, and gets the key inside the defendant's bank.

If the above F’s face was blicked by hand and 2 times, and was blicked by hand, the above F’s blick paper (six blicks) was flicked into the part of the above F’s bridge, and the above F’s face was blicked to the face of G in the circumstances of the same blicking area, then the above G was blicked to the face of the above G.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. 피고인의 일부 법정 진술( 피고인은 범죄사실 기재와 같이 피해 경찰들을 폭행한 사실이 없다고 주장하나, 피고인 스스로도 열쇠를 꺼내서 손에 쥔 사실 및 라면 봉지를 바닥에 던진 사실을 자인하는 진술을 하고 있을 뿐만 아니라, 피해 경찰들 및 목격자의 일관된 진술, 폭행도구가 실존하였던 점 등에 비추어 보면, 범죄사실을 충분히 인정할 수 있으므로 피고인의 주장은 받아들이지 않는다)

1. Each legal statement of the witness H, G, and F;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of the protection and observation and the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the community service order is based on the face of female police by asserting only one opinion of the police who was dispatched by the defendant on the site inspection and measures of the police.