logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산고등법원 2020.01.23 2019노475
통신비밀보호법위반
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The court below's decision that the defendant has been granted a suspended sentence is too unhutiled and unfair.

2. The court below held that the crime of this case was committed under the circumstances unfavorable to the defendant, under which the crime of this case was committed without the consent of the general meeting of D in dispute, and that the crime of this case was committed under the circumstances unfavorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the crime of this case was recorded without the consent of D, and that D wishes to punish the defendant, the defendant was not only three months after entering the company of this case as of the time of the crime of this case, and considering this point, the defendant did not record the general meeting for malicious purposes to use the recording file for the purpose of maliciously in the related lawsuit, but rather, it appears that the executive officers and employees of the company of this case and the executive officers and employees of the company of this case, and the contents of the general meeting of the general meeting of shareholders and the operation report meeting of this case are deemed to have reached the crime of this case, even if the contents of the general meeting are recorded together in the course of requesting the recording of the recording of the recording of the general meeting of shareholders and the general meeting

Considering the above circumstances and the circumstances of sentencing, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, occupation, family relationship, criminal records, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the court below seems to have suspended the sentence by fully taking account of various circumstances concerning the sentencing, including the circumstances in dispute over the appropriate operation of D and the company of this case, as the grounds for appeal, in particular, as there are disputes over the appropriate operation of B, and there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that could change the sentencing of the court below after the judgment of the court below.

arrow