Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The facts charged in this case
A. A. On February 20, 2013, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s body in his/her hand while she was boomed by the victim G (the age of 69) within the 2nd Ecafeteria of the D market located in the Haju City of 19:00, in F and the f and the franc.
B. Around February 20, 2013, the Defendant threatened the victim G at the above place, stating that “Before he was sentenced to punishment. Before sunrise,” the Defendant threatened the victim G.
2. Of the facts charged in the instant case, the charge of assault is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act, and the charge of intimidation is a crime falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against each victim’s express intent under Article 283(3) of the Criminal Act.
However, according to the victim's legal statement, the victim can recognize the fact that he/she withdraws his/her wish to punish the defendant on July 25, 2013, which was after the public prosecution of this case was instituted. Thus, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.